Old Goat
08-06-2004, 01:41 PM
(Hope this is the correct place to post this).
Well, I really didn’t mean to cause such a stir about my 2005 Mustang post. You have to understand that to us nostalgic Pontiac folks, the “GTO” is an icon. Any new car with that name being introduced 30 years after the last GTO is going to (understandably) be looked with a critical eye – as viewed from the past. (Actually, some Pontiac purists maintain that the last Pontiacs are those that had a real Pontiac engines it them, rather than the “corporate” engines of today.)
To the Ferrari folks, Pontiac stole and corrupted the name of their very rare car. Car and Driver magazine did a heads-up test between a 64 Pontiac GTO and a Ferrari GTO. Talk about flaming mail! That one issue actually launched the magazine to what it is today.
I grew up in the muscle car era, which, by the way, Pontiac started by stuffing a 389 cubic inch engine in a Tempest. Yes, the Pontiac GTO was the first muscle car. It started a move in the automotive industry that lasted for a decade.
Back then, you could really tell the difference between different makes and models. All cars did not look like they were designed from a jellybean. I think that’s why the retro-movement has been so popular (so far) in the automotive industry (the PT Cruiser, Chevy SSR, Chrysler 300 and Prowler, 05 Mustang, etc.). Some people actually want a car that doesn’t look like the cookie-cutter car everyone else is driving. And, they want the superior handling and braking while maintaining some resemblance of an era gone by that has so many great memories for them.
I think this (the design decision) is what makes that car business so risky. Many a model has caused carmakers to suck it up and try again. The infamous Edsel is an example. And, if you study the history of the business, you’ll see just how risky a design (and name) can be.
So (IMO), I wish Pontiac had made the model much more distinctive or simply chose another name from the past, like maybe 2+2, for example. Since they chose not too, I’ll just have to get used to it (Anyway, the new Grand Prix looks nothing like it’s forerunner, the ‘62, which (IMO) is the most beautiful Pontiac ever produced).
One more thing on the “retro” cars; check out the Barrett – Jackson auto auctions and see what’s bringing in the BIG money.
BTW - If you have a chance, get to the Pontiac Nationals this weekend at Norwalk Raceway! http://www.norwalkraceway.com/node/view/779
Well, I really didn’t mean to cause such a stir about my 2005 Mustang post. You have to understand that to us nostalgic Pontiac folks, the “GTO” is an icon. Any new car with that name being introduced 30 years after the last GTO is going to (understandably) be looked with a critical eye – as viewed from the past. (Actually, some Pontiac purists maintain that the last Pontiacs are those that had a real Pontiac engines it them, rather than the “corporate” engines of today.)
To the Ferrari folks, Pontiac stole and corrupted the name of their very rare car. Car and Driver magazine did a heads-up test between a 64 Pontiac GTO and a Ferrari GTO. Talk about flaming mail! That one issue actually launched the magazine to what it is today.
I grew up in the muscle car era, which, by the way, Pontiac started by stuffing a 389 cubic inch engine in a Tempest. Yes, the Pontiac GTO was the first muscle car. It started a move in the automotive industry that lasted for a decade.
Back then, you could really tell the difference between different makes and models. All cars did not look like they were designed from a jellybean. I think that’s why the retro-movement has been so popular (so far) in the automotive industry (the PT Cruiser, Chevy SSR, Chrysler 300 and Prowler, 05 Mustang, etc.). Some people actually want a car that doesn’t look like the cookie-cutter car everyone else is driving. And, they want the superior handling and braking while maintaining some resemblance of an era gone by that has so many great memories for them.
I think this (the design decision) is what makes that car business so risky. Many a model has caused carmakers to suck it up and try again. The infamous Edsel is an example. And, if you study the history of the business, you’ll see just how risky a design (and name) can be.
So (IMO), I wish Pontiac had made the model much more distinctive or simply chose another name from the past, like maybe 2+2, for example. Since they chose not too, I’ll just have to get used to it (Anyway, the new Grand Prix looks nothing like it’s forerunner, the ‘62, which (IMO) is the most beautiful Pontiac ever produced).
One more thing on the “retro” cars; check out the Barrett – Jackson auto auctions and see what’s bringing in the BIG money.
BTW - If you have a chance, get to the Pontiac Nationals this weekend at Norwalk Raceway! http://www.norwalkraceway.com/node/view/779