2007 GTO News:) [Archive] - Pontiac GTO Forums: Pontiac GTO Forum

: 2007 GTO News:)


formula79
10-24-2003, 07:42 PM
Read this close guys...alot of GTO info in here...

Pretty much the GTO will be a new Camaro and then some...:)

And Skie can back me up on this article which I published in GMI a few months back being valid:).

Work on a new 5th generation Camaro, though GM will tell you different, began about two years ago in almost a skunkworks fashion. It was a difficult task for GM to perform in secret especially during the acrimonious final year of the fourth generation Camaro. GM constantly referring to the Camaro being on “Hiatus” is a sure sign that they were not fully giving up on the Camaro. Initial work was largely marketing studies, seeing what potential Camaro buyer must have, would like to have, and defiantly don’t want. This kind of research is done before engineering and design on a new car program. Camaro is the 3rd most recognized name in GM’s portfolio, and it has understandably become notion at GM that it had to come back. The current team working on the new Camaro is pushing to build a car that will be appealing not only when it’s released, but 5-7 years later (as far out as 2015!). That means for the most part that retro is out, which is good for Bob Lutz, who dislikes such design to begin with. GM does not want another T-bird or new Beetle, as their sales do not hold up well over time. Initially in the development process, Cadillac’s Sigma platform was considered the leading architecture for which to base the new Camaro. Several issues however came up with this choice, the first one of which being the cost of the Cadillac platform which was not designed with Chevrolet prices in mind. Secondly, the Sigma platform has a very high cowl (commonly called firewall) height that was made as a concession for the Cadillac SRX Crossover. This however is not ideal for a low slung sports coupe and would be very expensive to impossible to correct. This realization occurred at about the same point GM discovered Holden. In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. When they signed a 3-year agreement with Holden to build the GTO, they also had an eye on the future, and an American made GTO. It seems Holden was already developing a successor to the V-chassis that the Monaro, GTO, and Commodore are all built on dubbed VE. The VE chassis (as Holden calls it) is sort of a hybrid Sigma/V-car design with most of the Sigma’s structure mated to V-Car suspension elements. This new design is being engineered to be fully compliant with US laws and will be built in one or two US factories beginning 2005-2006. It is Holden’s manufacturing system which allows for several cars to be built in one factory that is the cornerstone to GM’s plans. Currently they build 20 variants of the V-car in one factory down under. This setup GM hopes in the US will allow for a Buick to build say a $45,000 Lexus fighting sedan on the same line a $20,000 V6 Chevy Camaro. The US version of the VE chassis is currently being called Sigma-Lite or Sigma-Mass among those in the know, however GM has yet to give it an official name. The chassis debuted just this week as the Opel Insignia concept, proving how far it is along in development. The VE will also underpin the next GTO which will be made in the US in 2007. This new VE-based GTO is said to be lower, wider, and more aggressive than the current V-car based version according to those who have seen it. Expect the new GTO to be more identifiable as a GTO, while being a fully modern (non-retro) design. I believe the Insignia concept shows the low slung rounded look that will be the signature of this platform.

Now what does all this mean for the Camaro? Well since it was decided that the GTO would be redesigned and built stateside, Chevy has been in the game developing a coupe for themselves as a counterpart. Common notion was that this car would be a Chevelle, since it has historically been the GTO’s platform sibling. This speculation was recently fired by the fact that Chevy recently trademarked the Chevelle name again. In fact, for a few months there were questions in GM concerning what the new Chevy coupe would be called as some wanted it to be a Monte Carlo, some a Chevelle, and the majority wanted a Camaro. GMI has learned that the Chevelle rumors really never had any muscle behind them, especially after GM was roasted alive by GTO enthusiasts over the 2004 car, Chevrolet has become worried about getting the same reception over a reborn Chevelle. Cementing the name of the new Chevrolet coupe was ironically the Mustang concept at the 2004 NAIAS. Upon first site it gave Bob Lutz a case of the “I wants”, and pretty much cemented that any coupe that comes from Chevrolet will be have to first be a Camaro.

Its also noteworthy that we’ve learned that the new Camaro will not be the same size as the GTO, as the highly flexible chassis allows for different proportions among car models. Think of it as a GTO on a diet with some dimensional excesses removed. Our sources assure us that no one will mistake a Camaro for a GTO both in size or appearance. This new 5th Gen Camaro is currently on a timeline for a 2007 model year introduction, provided that no unexpected obstacles fall in it’s path. GM’s maze of new model concept approvals is staggering, and the new car does not have the final stamp quite yet. However it should be noted that at this point neither does the 2007 GTO, and that this is normal in the approval process for vehicles this far out. This final approval by GM’s Product Planning Board does not occur until the car is within about two years of going into production. In short, if the 2007 GTO becomes reality (which we all know will happen), then a 2007 Camaro almost certainly will to.

GM was quite proud of the fact that the Camaro was the fastest pony car during it’s final years and is willing to grow to great lengths to ensure it picks up where it left off. GM can match the Ford Mustang step for step horsepower wise with it’s superior powertrain unit. GM’s engines are cheaper and make more HP/Dollar than their respective Ford units despite the false generally held notion they are low tech. Power will likely come in three flavors, base V6, medium V8, and high end V8. The base V6 will likely be a high-value 3.5L (200HP) or 3.9L (230HP) engine. Expect GM to match the Mustang in V6 performance, but not exceed it. It is important that GM save costs on the V6 Camaro as it will likely be among the cheapest cars built on the whole Sigma-Lite platform. Though V6 buyers care about performance, cost and value seem to take more precedence in this segment. As much as people would like a 3.6L 255 HP high feature V6, it’s not likely due to its much increased cost. They do however, plan to offer a bolt on version of the supercharger used on the 285HP 3.5L that will show up in the 2005 Pontiac G6 to the general public through dealers. Contrary to some rumors, a 4-cylnder is not in the plans as it does not fit the image Chevrolet wants for the new Camaro. For a mid-level V8 expect either a 320 HP 5.3L or a 340HP detuned version of the Corvette’s 6.0L LS2 base engine.The 5.3L is the less likely of the above mentioned engines to get the nod because we are unaware of any plans to certify it for car use, a road the 6.0L is well down. For all intents the 5.7L is dead as the new Corvette will use a 6.0L engine in it’s place. This mid-model is likely to car the Z28 designation which will upset some Z28 enthusiasts, but follows the line with the Camaro’s recent history The top level V8 likely to again be called SS will also most likely be the 6.0L LS2 directly from the base Corvette. This engine making probably 10-20 HP less than in Corvette trim will make in the area of 390HP. The decision to use the SS designation follows GM recent trend of using the designation of the top performing car for each model. The car will also probably have some kind of affiliation with GM Performance Division. It is well known that Holden is designing it’s new VE cars to use 6 speed automatic transmissions, making them an obvious choice for the SS 5th Gen Camaro. The 6-speed automatic is actually simpler and cheaper to manufacture than a 5 speed design. There are rumors that team Corvette badly wants a paddle-shift setup to come from this design, but is exploring all options. This new transmission will be made at GM’s Willow Run plant that currently makes the 4L80-E and 4T80E transmissions. Four or Five Speed Autos will be used in lesser models. There will also be a 6-speed manual offered for those who wish to shift on their own.
On the outside the new Camaro will be lower and more seductive than the current GTO. It will also feature styling elements from the SS Concept of this year. People familiar with the new car claim it has a chrome bar concurrent of newer Chevrolets, however that element is very much in limbo. Naturally, the interior will be fully modern keeping in line with the GM’s recent achievements. Interiors have been a hot topic on the auto scene the last few years, and GM understands that the Camaro needs to hit a homerun to succeed. Ergonomics will be inherently better that the 4th Gen cars simply due to the better design of the new chassis. Basic features debuting on cars such as the 2004 Malibu are sure to be considered for the new car, such as remote start, Displacement on Demand, and XM and MP3 Capable radios. It is actually cost effective for GM to include such features in the new car because they were already included in the overall architecture design which will be the structure for more expensive cars. The new car will also include ABS and a revised traction control system that will make the Camaro an all weather car. In reality anything is possible, because Sigma –Lite will be so widely used, pretty much all of GM’s parts bin of options will be engineered to work with it, making the cost to include them in a Camaro negligible, What all of this means is that the Camaro will receive levels of options and refinements that was never imaginable, because it rides on a platform designed to for cars that cost much more. Things such as roll up windows and manual locks will not even be considered because it is cheaper to just include the power options than do the engineering to include manual options. Higher end versions may include features such as On-Star that are highly profitable and compact enough to not hurt performance. If GM thinks that people will pay for it, GM will likely include it. This is great for buyers of the top level Camaro will get much more for their money than they did with the 4th Generation. Speaking of price, expect GM to price the Camaro similar to the 4th Generation Camaro, slightly more than a Mustang of comparable price.


If Ford decided to chase the Corvette with a 500HP Cobra, don’t expect a Camaro to chase it. GM feels that the Corvette will do a good enough job of disposing with the challenge. The price spread could likely run from about $20,000 to $37,000+ (In 2007 dollars) for a 400 HP fully-loaded Camaro. Considering in 2002 a base V6 Camaro started at $19,000, this is not much of a price increase. GM thinks it can sell a 110,000 units a year at this pricing through tapping such markets as past buyers, well off twenty and thirty something males, buyers put off by the retro Mustang, and in general anyone looking for amazing performance at a Chevrolet price. GM has committed itself to making the Camaro not only faster and better than the Mustang, but quite possibly on of the best performers in it’s price range.

Though this article is a representation of the current state of the new Camaro to the best of our knowledge, please remember the car is three years from hitting showrroms and some details may change. When the wraps come off the 2007 Camaro it will bring an end to what has been a classic struggle within GM to keep one of it’s classic nameplates viable in an ever changing market. Though there have been many people pushing for this new car within GM at various levels for the last 7 years, few on the outside will ever understand the hard work and struggle that went into bringing a new car to light. However, Rest assured however, the new car is one that will be worthy of the Camaro name, and more importantly, one that people will buy!

Tails
10-24-2003, 08:00 PM
Whew, Good article and fits with what we know and have surmised,

:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce:

crazyfool8281
10-24-2003, 08:44 PM
So this means the real GTO will be coming out in 2007?

DANSLS1
10-24-2003, 09:08 PM
Originally posted by crazyfool8281@Oct 25 2003, 12:44 AM
So this means the real GTO will be coming out in 2007?
No, it means the real GTO will be made for 2004, 2005 and 2006 only :D

d2alio
10-25-2003, 07:40 PM
Originally posted by rschumacherfan1+Oct 24 2003, 06:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (rschumacherfan1 @ Oct 24 2003, 06:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-crazyfool8281@Oct 25 2003, 12:44 AM
So this means the real GTO will be coming out in 2007?
No, it means the real GTO will be made for 2004, 2005 and 2006 only :D [/b][/quote]
it's one thing to be excited that you're getting an 04', but the fact is that the "real" GTO will and always has been (since way before this story) set for 2007. If it's not made in the US it's not a "real" GTO. Hence, the Monaro-to-GTO-US ports are nothing more than imported cars with a US brand on it.

The VE will also underpin the next GTO which will be made in the US in 2007. This new VE-based GTO is said to be lower, wider, and more aggressive than the current V-car based version according to those who have seen it. Expect the new GTO to be more identifiable as a GTO, while being a fully modern (non-retro) design. I believe the Insignia concept shows the low slung rounded look that will be the signature of this platform.

The 2007 GTO will far outshine the 2004 (for obvious reasons). Technology itself will be better by then and they will have found out how to squeeze more in to the car for less the cost. NOt only that, but it'll be designed here, which will get rid of the european look. While I like the 04', it's still a european looking car and is thus a european car. The 04' won't hold much value in the long run seeing how it's background is darkened by the fact that it's not US made or US designed. Once the 07's role around backed by American ingenuity the value and brandworthy GTO will be back.

maghut1
10-25-2003, 09:20 PM
If, as you say it will not hold its value due to the fact that it was not designed or built in the USA how do you account for the fact that Ford and GM products built over the last several years have lost a much greater percentage of there value than Honda's and other foriegn cars. I love American cars and have never owned a car that was not built by GM or Ford but the fact remains that they do not hold up there value as well as cars from Japan or Europe. I hate that fact but it is true. Recent figures show 2001 Fords and Chevy's lost up to 65 to 70% of there original value while the Accord lost about 50%. So maybe we are lucky the Aussies are building it. The US companies are cutting there resale value by having 0% financing and crazy rebates. Once I get 7K in discounts for a brand new F-150 what do you think happens to a year or two ones value, it goes down as well. If Pontiac does not discount the heck out of this car it will hold its resale and maybe break the trend for most American cars.

Davbo
10-25-2003, 09:30 PM
d2alio is a punk. check out this thread:

http://www.newagegto.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=351

Orbit Orange
10-25-2003, 09:30 PM
d2alio

Some might argue that the first and true GTO came out in 1962 as a Ferrari. ;)

Just some food for thought. :)

DANSLS1
10-25-2003, 11:22 PM
Once the 07's role around backed by American ingenuity the value and brandworthy GTO will be back.

Yeah like the american ingenuity that caused my saturn to spin a rod bearing at 70k miles and rattle the interior like an airplane taking off from the day I bought it? If the Monaro / GTO is 1/2 the car of the billing I may consider buying 2 or 3 during the run, just to have another car to fall back on when the first one is gone. This may be seconded by the potential for the US GTO design team to share components with the Aztek design team...

Tails
10-25-2003, 11:55 PM
Originally posted by rschumacherfan1@Oct 26 2003, 03:22 AM
Once the 07's role around backed by American ingenuity the value and brandworthy GTO will be back.

Yeah like the american ingenuity that caused my saturn to spin a rod bearing at 70k miles and rattle the interior like an airplane taking off from the day I bought it? If the Monaro / GTO is 1/2 the car of the billing I may consider buying 2 or 3 during the run, just to have another car to fall back on when the first one is gone. This may be seconded by the potential for the US GTO design team to share components with the Aztek design team...
Now THAT's funny!!!

It occurs to me that the most vocal people against the '04 GTO are the ones that don't know what they really want. If they knew what they wanted then they would just get it and not worry about what other people were getting. Know what I mean??!!?? Of course the other reason is that they have no self worth and are the ones that get a kick out of trying to pull peoples chains.

:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce:

d2alio
10-26-2003, 12:25 AM
Originally posted by Davbo@Oct 25 2003, 06:30 PM
d2alio is a punk. check out this thread:

http://www.newagegto.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=351
lol I was trying to be nice, but you are truly a dumbass. Your post had no bearing to this thread whatsoever. You truly showed how much of a dumbass you are. Oh, and when I say dumbass, I mean for it to sound like Red from That 70's Show. So yea... I mean it harshly... just cause you're a dumbass.

Tails
10-26-2003, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by d2alio+Oct 26 2003, 04:25 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (d2alio @ Oct 26 2003, 04:25 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Davbo@Oct 25 2003, 06:30 PM
d2alio is a punk.* check out this thread:

http://www.newagegto.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=351
lol I was trying to be nice, but you are truly a dumbass. Your post had no bearing to this thread whatsoever. You truly showed how much of a dumbass you are. Oh, and when I say dumbass, I mean for it to sound like Red from That 70's Show. So yea... I mean it harshly... just cause you're a dumbass. [/b][/quote]
Hmm why would you think that Davbo calling you a punk is bad??!!?? You do come across as unreal with a purpose. Maybe a writer or something. Of course I wear purple colored glasses.

:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce:

d2alio
10-26-2003, 12:07 PM
Originally posted by Tails+Oct 25 2003, 09:48 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Tails @ Oct 25 2003, 09:48 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by d2alio@Oct 26 2003, 04:25 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Davbo@Oct 25 2003, 06:30 PM
d2alio is a punk.* check out this thread:

http://www.newagegto.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=351
lol I was trying to be nice, but you are truly a dumbass. Your post had no bearing to this thread whatsoever. You truly showed how much of a dumbass you are. Oh, and when I say dumbass, I mean for it to sound like Red from That 70's Show. So yea... I mean it harshly... just cause you're a dumbass.
Hmm why would you think that Davbo calling you a punk is bad??!!?? You do come across as unreal with a purpose. Maybe a writer or something. Of course I wear purple colored glasses.

:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: [/b][/quote]
Mostly just because like I said before his post had absolutely nothing to do with anything <--- :huh: but yea... he could have at least said, "hey, I disagree... you're wrong." But instead, he acted like the 13 year old he is and just says, "d2alio is a punk" lol... it was completely random and obviously I got to his ego.

I'll just do myself and the community a favor and discontinue my membership here. Can an admin delete my account?

scottknight
10-26-2003, 02:02 PM
Better be careful there d2alio. I got to be a moderator here in spite of the way you ticked me off when you first showed up. What davbo said was not nice, but don't just keep showing everyone how right he is.

cvp33
10-26-2003, 04:30 PM
I agree with Davbo on most things and this topic is no different. :D
Then again I wouldn't have liked myself when I was 20 either. I too thought I knew everything and had it all figured out and probably sounded alot like d2alio. Funny how kids, marriage and a career can change all that.

d2alio
10-26-2003, 08:23 PM
Originally posted by rschumacherfan1@Oct 25 2003, 08:22 PM
Once the 07's role around backed by American ingenuity the value and brandworthy GTO will be back.

Yeah like the american ingenuity that caused my saturn to spin a rod bearing at 70k miles and rattle the interior like an airplane taking off from the day I bought it? If the Monaro / GTO is 1/2 the car of the billing I may consider buying 2 or 3 during the run, just to have another car to fall back on when the first one is gone. This may be seconded by the potential for the US GTO design team to share components with the Aztek design team...
yet another weird (partially dumb) comment. You're talking about a Saturn dude. since when have Saturn's ever been a good car. Saturn's are the kind of cars you get your kid as a beater car. If you bought a Saturn new for yourself then a) that's all you could afford or B) you honestly thought that Saturn's were good cars.

We're talking about GTO's here... not a K-Mart piece of crap. Maybe you need to realize that. :microwave:

DANSLS1
10-26-2003, 08:37 PM
Originally posted by d2alio+Oct 27 2003, 01:23 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (d2alio @ Oct 27 2003, 01:23 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-rschumacherfan1@Oct 25 2003, 08:22 PM
Once the 07's role around backed by American ingenuity the value and brandworthy GTO will be back.

Yeah like the american ingenuity that caused my saturn to spin a rod bearing at 70k miles and rattle the interior like an airplane taking off from the day I bought it? If the Monaro / GTO is 1/2 the car of the billing I may consider buying 2 or 3 during the run, just to have another car to fall back on when the first one is gone. This may be seconded by the potential for the US GTO design team to share components with the Aztek design team...
yet another weird (partially dumb) comment. You're talking about a Saturn dude. since when have Saturn's ever been a good car. Saturn's are the kind of cars you get your kid as a beater car. If you bought a Saturn new for yourself then a) that's all you could afford or B) you honestly thought that Saturn's were good cars.

We're talking about GTO's here... not a K-Mart piece of crap. Maybe you need to realize that. :microwave: [/b][/quote]
I bought the Saturn in '95 fresh out of college. It fit both descriptions - I thought it was a good car, and it was about all I could afford. The point still is - I think just about every American made car fits your description - kmart pieces of crap. That's why it's so nice to be able to get a 'foreign' Pontiac that from all indications will be well built. If the GTO hadn't have been announced, there is absolutely 0% chance that I would be buying American. I am glad to be given the chance to have a well-built car, a V8 RWD - and have my check go to an American company every month, but the 3rd of those is pure bonus. Please don't take this any way other than the truth - us Americans haven't quite gotten the quality thing yet. We spend a lot of money on trying to copy 'quality' programs from all over the place, yet we don't have anybody using the underlying principals of common sense in the implementation. That means that every car made in the US from the big 3, and many of the foreign companies with transplants, just can't compete with our foreign brethren. And I'm talking Europe, Japan, Australia and closer to home - Canada. The car I had before the Saturn was a $5995 special '89 geo metro with a 3 liter suzuki swift 1L motor. I abused the heck out of this car - it was a 5-speed and it saw 80 mph in 3rd gear on NUMEROUS occasions. At 110k miles of abuse, the car was totalled in an accident. It had less interior rattle than the saturn, barely burned oil, and had one set of plugs and tires replaced around 60k, 3 sets of breakpads and that was it done to the car. It would have driven another 50k miles easy. Somehow I feel really cheated to have paid more than double for 1/2 the car - and I'm hoping I'm avoiding that mistake this time. If not, probably only Audi and BMW will see my face next time I'm shopping.

zAp
10-26-2003, 09:50 PM
They're getting the VE platform for the 07 GTO, wow that's news since it wouldve been the natural evolution for the GTO anyway as Holden will move all the Commodore variants to its new platform. They'll be building a Holden like assembly plant in the US, that's not really news either as the Australian plant would not be able to keep up with growing demand in the long run as far as the US market goes. The fact that they are going to release other US models around the platform only makes it more important that production take place in larger volumes in the US. The great thing is that US designers will be able let rip with body designs that more suit US tastes, so the platform and manufacturing can be appreciated for its merits rather than cultural taste dislikes. I think this will be a real success. However Holden will then have no input into the interior designs, so I hope that's one area US designers might have learnt something out of the 04 GTO. The build fit and finish should be on par with Holden vehicles if the plants are more or less the same and due care is taken.

As for '04 buyers you're still getting the original Newage GTO on a tried and tested fully mature platform even though it is about to be superceded. When it takes your fancy you can just say you own an exotic import:)

Orbit Orange
10-26-2003, 09:58 PM
d2alio said,

I'll just do myself and the community a favor and discontinue my membership here. Can an admin delete my account?


I can talk to Branden or Skie and it probably could be done. There is the alternative of just not posting also.

Or..... you could listen to what people say, post without namecalling and become a valued member of NewAgeGTO. You will find out that a little sugar in the medicine will make it go down easier than $%&#.

I thought rschumacher's point about his Saturn was VERY pertinent, funny too! Don't go knocking Saturns around as they happen to rate quite high with customer satisfaction polls. And I say this even though I don't particularly want one.

Now if I just had to guess what is going on with our d2alio I would guess the following.

I've noticed d2alio that you posted quite frequently then I did not see anything posted from you for a while. You seemed to be getting aboard the GTO bandwagon but all of a sudden you seem to have jumped off. I know you were talking about getting a beater to make it through til you landed your GTO. Don't trash the GTO due to envy or jealousy because you don't have or will not get one. Don't knock the Saturn as a "high school beater". What are you driving right now??? Could be a Saturn might look pretty ****ed good!

I guess what I'm trying to say is that we want to like you and hear what you have to say. We know your young 19 or 20?? I remember thinking I knew everything when I was there and that "older" people knew jack$#%&. The truth is I knew spit and could have used some good advice from my "elders". So that's what I'm trying to offer here, just some advice, take it if you want, leave it if you want. We don't need to be impressed by stories of getting 6 speeding tickets or driving an average of 120 mph. Sure that might impress the teens but not us. Trash talk and name calling won't do it either.

Don't give up on the GTO. Just relax a little, this site and cars should be FUN, it's a hobby! Sorry I'm so preachy but I'm really trying to help you out.
:)

d2alio
10-26-2003, 09:59 PM
what you're failing to understand is that the 2004 - 2006 GTO is about as "American" as Honda. It's not an American car. And calling it one is unrealistic. It's an imported car with an American brand. Certainly doesn't make it American because of that. For the most part though I'd have to agree with you on American cars being pieces of crap. But only in regard to modern "general" market cars. Camaro's, Corvette's, etc. are exception, but like I said, those are "general" market cars. However, the classic's were built a lot better. They were built to last. Today's modern cars aren't really built to last, especially as far as American motorcraft goes.

But still, the 2004, 2005 and 2006 GTO is not an American muscle car. It's a European muscle car and you and everyone else know it. It's just a cheap way for people to say, "hey i have an American muscle car" when in reality it's not. Sort of hypocritical. If you're gonna claim it as anything, it needs to be represented for what it is and not what "label" is on it.

zAp
10-26-2003, 10:14 PM
What you fail to understand is that the domestic content in the real sense of the 04 and the 07 will not be mind blowingly different. The 04 has the US powerplant and "some" US styling albeit at the front end. The 07 will still be on the next generation Holden platform but will use US labour for production and Pontiac designers will be free to express a local flavour in the body design. It was all going to happen eventually but for a number of reasons they had to import them in the intermediate years. Production plants don't spring from the ground overnight and it would hardly have been worth tooling up for platform that is in its final years.

You see its all one big master plan to return affordable RWD V8 muscle cars, with modern engineering and build quality to GM showrooms in the US. You can either get with it or jump on the band wagon down the track, either way, enjoy!


"It's a European muscle car and you and everyone else know it" Dude I think you need some geography lessons, LOL. AustrALia not Austria. :blink:

Orbit Orange
10-26-2003, 10:23 PM
Now there we go some good valid points.

To tackle one of them though.

But still, the 2004, 2005 and 2006 GTO is not an American muscle car. It's a European muscle car

Technically the new GTO would be an Australian muscle car. Australia is it's own continent and is in no way attached to Europe or even remotely near Europe.

How about an American Muscle Car with a European flavor by way of Australia??? ;)

Face it the new GTO IS an American Muscle car. It is made for Pontiac, for the American market by a General Motors owned division Holden.

And just to add a couple of other points. The demised F body was built in Canada, so were the Camaros and Firebirds European muscle. I mean Canada has a closer proximity to Europe and more ties to Europe than Australia even (Great Britain and France in particular). No they were/are American.

Even a few of the sacred GTO's of old were assembled in Canada (a few were built in Oshawa in 1970 !!!). Would that make those GTO's European?

I understand your angle. Yes the new GTO is not built in the US or was it even designed here. But the performance and image it has speaks American muscle car to me. Sure it might be European inspired or "flavored", but it's not European.

And as a side note



However, the classic's were built a lot better. They were built to last. Today's modern cars aren't really built to last, especially as far as American motorcraft goes.


Even though they aren't classics ever heard of a Vega or Pinto? And on top of that how many original musclecar classics are unrestored? Answer, not many. Remember I'm just debating here nothing personal, because you do have a couple of good points. :)

d2alio
10-26-2003, 10:50 PM
It is made for Pontiac, for the American market by a General Motors owned division Holden.

The Holden Monaro was in no way built with becoming the GTO. Pontiac of American merely saw it LATER and said, "hey, this would be a good GTO"... It was never built with the intent to become the GTO though.

geekoid
10-27-2003, 02:46 AM
The Pontiac Tempast/LeMans in the early sixties were not originally built with the intent of becoming GTOs either. It was an option added in 1964 after Pontiac management at the time thought, "Hey, this would make a great high performace car. Lets call it the GTO."

Yes, they were built in the U.S. The current GTO is not built in the U.S. For me, that is not a problem. I will still consider the GTO an American car. I can understand having loyalty to a product made in the U.S. I will not, however, dismiss an excellent product simply because it was not manufactured here. Honda, Toyota, Mercedes, and various other "import" brands manufacture vehicles in the United States. Does that make their vehicles American? American made, certainly. Does that make their vehicles better? That is cause for debate.

I will applaud if/when the GTO is manufactured in the U.S. Until then, I refuse to think less of the GTO because it is not manufactured in the U.S. The 2004-2006 GTOs will be outstanding vehicles.

Just my opinion, nothing more.

DANSLS1
10-27-2003, 07:07 AM
It's not an American car.

The GTO is being sold in America, by Pontiac (an American company) and my check will go to GMAC (an American company). In todays world market, that's as American of a vehicle as you can hope to get.

VelodromeRacer
10-27-2003, 08:58 AM
I have the proof to end the whole argument!

My father-in-law, a retired GM employee, sees an import in his hometown while we are driving down the road, I point it out and ask what is that!!, he replys with, "they allow a permit for one or two of those in the city".

Fast foreward, I was about to marry his daughter, I am looking at a Mazda MX6, my future wife states, if you buy that, I will have to repay my parents for college and we will pay for our wedding!

Fast foreward, I have a few british sports cars, my father-in-law is not upset-he states "anyone who made money on them is now dead"

So I bring you to today, My father-in-law thinks GM is doing the right thing, Holden is GM he says, GM will learn how to build better cars and become even more efficient with their platform and he knows that this car is as american as they get anymore. He knows that the GTO will once again begin the muscle car era and that this motor/tranny has the blood of the most beloved american sports car, the corvette!

Really, the idea here is to relax! I don't like camaros or mustangs, but you know what, I am glad they are/were there. The 2004 GTO is breaking ground and making possible the 2007 GTO. I won't even go into the Chrylser/Mercedes thing.

Right now it looks like the 2004 will have better quality than the 2007. You know, I will probably buy a 2007 and keep the 2004!

I hope these cars get here soon so we can start talking about mods/kill stories than this stuff......

dkGTO19
10-27-2003, 09:33 AM
Some thoughts of my own.

First of all, I think that there is nothing wrong at all with this car being built and designed in australia. I think that all these people who say its not american and i'm not gonna get it then blah blah blah are just too closed minded to go ahead and see the car for what it is, the best muscle car ever built for the past 30+ years!! That is a fact, sure the new Z06's are great machines, but the quality of the GTO sets itself apart of every "muscle car" built for the past 30 years. I for one will be buying the current GTO in most likely the 2005/6 model year, and unless I see something that show's the quality of the 2007 model and the value of it looks just as good or even better than this new age GTO, then my check is going to the current one.

d2alio
10-27-2003, 12:29 PM
Originally posted by rschumacherfan1@Oct 27 2003, 05:07 AM
It's not an American car.

The GTO is being sold in America, by Pontiac (an American company) and my check will go to GMAC (an American company). In todays world market, that's as American of a vehicle as you can hope to get.
So if you bought Honda, but you're sending your payment ot Honda of America does that make it American? Your answer is no. I'm in no way "dissing" the GTO, as I said before i think it's a great car. I'm merely attacking the view of claiming it as being an "american muscle car", which is certainly is not.

Tails
10-27-2003, 12:39 PM
Originally posted by d2alio@Oct 27 2003, 05:29 PM
I'm merely attacking the view of claiming it as being an "american muscle car", which is certainly is not.

It certainly is!!

:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce:

hamarabi
10-27-2003, 03:35 PM
Originally posted by d2alio@Oct 26 2003, 10:59 PM
However, the classic's were built a lot better. They were built to last. Today's modern cars aren't really built to last, especially as far as American motorcraft goes.

I know you are young but this statement is way off. We all tend to see the past with somewhat rose colored glasses but come on... Cars from the 60's and 70's were probably lucky to see 100K miles. Most of the examples still around today have had some talented hands keeping them in good shape. It is a lot more common to see cars "turn" the odometers now a days then in the past. Why do you think they went from a 5 to a 6 digit odometer? I will concede that older cars were built with thicker metals and withstood fender benders better but newer cars are more rigid and much lighter significantly improving fuel mileage and are probably about as safe with the inclusion of crush zones and the like to better manage crash forces. Cars from that era were pretty much used-up by 100K which is really not the case anymore.

Shawn

Orbit Orange
10-27-2003, 05:01 PM
Originally posted by d2alio@Oct 26 2003, 10:50 PM
It is made for Pontiac, for the American market by a General Motors owned division Holden.

The Holden Monaro was in no way built with becoming the GTO. Pontiac of American merely saw it LATER and said, "hey, this would be a good GTO"... It was never built with the intent to become the GTO though.
d2alio

I think you misread my words. Let me correct.

The tense is "IS" not "WAS" built for America and American buyers. Sure it's basically a Holden with Pontiac styling cues. It IS made for Americans. Is it 100% American, of course not, what car is nowadays? Should it be labeled American, yes it should. They are not sending this car to Europe, Australia or anywhere else for that matter, even Canada.

At least I'm glad you've dropped the European thing. ;)

Our money will go to General Motors for buying the new GTO. General Motors is a predominantly American based and owned company. As someone stated before, this is just about as American as it gets. To go by your strict and rigid standards on "American" cars there would be NONE that qualify. Things just aren't black and white anymore, there are lots of gray areas. I agree that the new GTO falls into this gray area.

I guess we will just have to agree to disagree as the saying goes. :)

DANSLS1
10-27-2003, 08:25 PM
Originally posted by d2alio+Oct 27 2003, 05:29 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (d2alio @ Oct 27 2003, 05:29 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-rschumacherfan1@Oct 27 2003, 05:07 AM
It's not an American car.

The GTO is being sold in America, by Pontiac (an American company) and my check will go to GMAC (an American company). In todays world market, that's as American of a vehicle as you can hope to get.
So if you bought Honda, but you're sending your payment ot Honda of America does that make it American? Your answer is no. I'm in no way "dissing" the GTO, as I said before i think it's a great car. I'm merely attacking the view of claiming it as being an "american muscle car", which is certainly is not. [/b][/quote]
You obviously are trying to argue so much you missed one of my three (3) criteria:

1) sold in the US - GTO yes, Honda yes

2) American company - Pontiac yes, Honda NO - ding ding ding

3) GMAC American yes, Honda of America American company - No, not really

And while this has certainly been enjoyable, I'm done with you now - nice chatting.

kbaba
10-27-2003, 09:29 PM
:pain:

D2ALIO,

I thought you were going bye bye. What happened?

Davbo
10-27-2003, 09:37 PM
Originally posted by rschumacherfan1@Oct 27 2003, 09:25 PM
And while this has certainly been enjoyable, I'm done with you now - nice chatting.
My thoughts exactly.

digitalgod
10-27-2003, 10:55 PM
My definition of an American car is simple and has nothing to do with a Union telling me to buy American for them when they don't do anything for me to buy the car cheaper. My buy American is based on the fact that I'm smack dab in the middle of Kansas. Every GM, Ford, and Chrysler line is represented here. How many foreign manufacturers, none. That means if something breaks on my American car, I can get parts, any part, instead of driving 50 to 200 miles to get a part that the local parts stores don't carry, trust me, their are some when you live in the middle of Kansas. Does this mean I consider every GM, Ford, and Chrysler an American car. No. I had a Dodge D50 4x4. It was a great truck but the Mitsubishi motor was the biggest pain in the ass and every time the engine broke I had to wait 3 days to get parts and parts broke often. Worse, being imported parts they cost a fortune. I had an oil pump fail. A 350 chevy high performance oil pump could be bought for less than 25 bucks. My oil pump cost me $350 and that was with my brother's mechanic's discount. Why so long to get the parts, because the dealership kept few if any of these foriegn built parts on hand (because they're expensive)and the truck from the warehouse (400 miles away) only delivered on Tuesdays and Fridays. So my definition of an American car is any car built by the big three with an American motor and an American transmission. This means I consider the new GTO an American car and the Yamaha powered Taurus SHOs, even though they were built here, not an American car because you get gouged on imported parts at every major repair.

My point, I buy American because it reduces costs and frustrations for me down the line. I have a reason, not a union tag line. If Toyota and Mazda came to town and had some cars with US motors in them, I'd consider them too.

Finally, the new GTO may not be put together here but its as American as I need it to be. I'm satisfied with it.

My question for all of you would be how American was my D50 4x4 or the v6 powered Ford Taurus SHO?

Orbit Orange
10-28-2003, 05:16 PM
digital you make a good point.

I had a Dodge D50 4x4. It was a great truck but the Mitsubishi motor was the biggest pain in the ass and every time the engine broke I had to wait 3 days to get parts and parts broke often.

My wife had a Ford Escort GT for a few years with a Mazda 1.8 L engine. Towards the end (it's sold now, YEAH!) the MAF went bad and the Ford dealer wanted 500 bucks for the thing! :o What a total ripoff, if it was the 1.9 L Ford engine the MAF would have been 100 bucks. (By the way I found a used one for $45.)

So I'm with you on buying American to keep the price down. I do worry about some parts of the GTO but being an LS1 at heart I know most parts will be readily available and cheaper.

As for the SHO with the Yamaha engine I understand your point.

Here's another. How about the Pontiac Vibe? A Toyota with a Toyota engine, is it American? There comes a point when it finally becomes too foreign and might be called an "import".

:D

Gaijin
10-28-2003, 06:09 PM
This thread is going slightly off topic. Let's keep it on the thread title. :knightrider:

mrgto
10-29-2003, 05:53 AM
Psssst, there is no more "AMERICAN" car companies. GM is Global. Ford is Global. DC is basically German now. Hell, Toyota can't even be called just a japaneese car company anymore.

They are all GLOBAL companies. Holden is to GM as Pontiac is to GM. They are both subsidiaries. As are all GM divisions. The HOLDEN is a GM car. Yes, GM is based in the United States, but it is still a GLOBAL company.

And don't tell anyone the LS1's that come in the GTO are made in Canada and the transmissions come from Mexico. ;)

zAp
10-29-2003, 06:13 AM
Mitsubishi Australia exports cars, what's the world coming to :ph34r:

drfresh
10-29-2003, 02:59 PM
:D I love the next GTO. Holden is GM, who cares that it wasn't designed or built by Americans, have you seen anything come from the GM stable lately that you said to yourself "man, I gotta get me one of those!!!" I know I haven't, and I like all kinds of cars, and trucks. Didn't GM designers back in 1964 travel to Australia and copy one of Holden's cars which became the GTO? I thought that was the way it happened back then, well now it's happening again, except this time they're building it for us. No White color option, what's up with that? Has anyone seen the Monaro SE Special Edition? I wish that color and wheel option was available for the GTO, beautiful!!! Can you order a GTO with the rear wing delete? Looks much nicer without it. Why is GM double shipping the drivetrains? Is it a matter of moving the chassis's around? Seams wasteful, hope it doesn't add to the cost of the GTO to the customer.

1970 Chevrolet El Camino owner / Toyota truck DD

Tails
10-29-2003, 03:09 PM
Welcome aboard to the insane asylum.
:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce:

Speedfreak
10-30-2003, 12:56 PM
Looks like the built in USA GTO will be the 6 litre.
Probably all be 400 HP by then.

TriShield
10-30-2003, 07:14 PM
All heresay.

TriShield
10-30-2003, 07:17 PM
Originally posted by drfresh@Oct 29 2003, 07:59 PM
Didn't GM designers back in 1964 travel to Australia and copy one of Holden's cars which became the GTO?
No. http://forums.offtopic.com/images/smilies/ugh.gif

drfresh
10-31-2003, 07:31 AM
I do believe that the 64' GTO WAS based on an Australian Holden of some sort. Some of the first photos of the new GTO were in Aussy land (coming from the Monaro) and pictured next to a 64'. Car and Driver also ran an episode on the TV show touching breifly on this when the GTO was at the LA or New York auto show pictured with all the other year GTOs (pirvate owner/ collectors). :ph34r:

Odin
10-31-2003, 08:07 AM
:bs: the old monaro and old gto have absolutely no relation what so ever.

Orbit Orange
10-31-2003, 11:59 PM
I do believe that the 64' GTO WAS based on an Australian Holden of some sort.

See the above answer. It is a resounding NO!!!

The 64 GTO was an option on the 64 Tempest which was Pontiac's midside vehicle. (Chevy had the Chevelle, Buick the Skylark, Olds the Cutlass)

We're not trying to pull your leg here just trying to help you out. :)

Again the answer is NO[SIZE=14]
;)

FunkyPig
11-03-2003, 08:35 AM
If anything I'd say Holden copied Pontiac. The 1971 HQ Monaro looks quite similar to a number of US Muscle cars of the time, notably the 1970s GTO.

drfresh
11-04-2003, 08:50 AM
Thanks guys, didn't mean to upset anyone. I have been known to be worng on occasion. Thanks for the heads up. CAN THE NEW GTO BE ORDERED WITHOUT THE REAR WING? :)

geekoid
11-05-2003, 02:09 AM
All 2004 GTOs will come with the rear wing standard. To my knowledge, there is no wing delete option. For 2005 and later, it remains to be seen.

DANSLS1
11-05-2003, 07:37 AM
Originally posted by Speedfreak@Oct 30 2003, 05:56 PM
Looks like the built in USA GTO will be the 6 litre.
Probably all be 400 HP by then.
I heard 427 HP and that it will be a modified Solstice body beefed up to look strikingly like a Cobra...







Ok, I heard that in my head - but at this point it's as accurate as any other speculation.

:laughbounce: :laughbounce: :laughbounce:

threepointsix
01-21-2004, 03:20 PM
The last '73 GTO was actually a whole different car - a P.O.S. Ventura for all you 'PURISTS' who think you are glorified in talking smack about the Monaro and its platform sharing and lack of hood scoops.

Old GTO A-body was the same as a Chevelle, Monte Carlo, Cutlass, Skylark. GTO was no more special than any of those cars & was re-badged and assembled by union striking low quality 'assemblers' folks who brought a sack lunch to work & complained all day. I'm sick of this 'legend' status on the mass produced dinasour car from the 60's.

Monaro is a beautifull, pupose built car that we are all LUCKY to get here in the US in this SUV haze of yank tanks. USA has the worst selection of car to choose from and the Monaro is a blessing in disguise as the GTO. I will retrim my car as an HSV GTO one day since the seats are stictched with the GTO logo. It will pay homage to the Aussie HSV car that has existed for the past 3 years. Otherwise I would just turn it into a left drive Saudi Lumina SS.

GTO was used on the Lemans platform - GTO is an option package on a GM A-body - thats it!